Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information
( 20.05.2010 )
Objective
To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review.
Study Design and Setting
We randomized participants in an evidence-based practice workshop (randomized controlled trial [RCT] I) and a Cochrane Collaboration entities meeting (RCT II) to receive a Cochrane review with or without an SoF table. In RCT I, we measured user satisfaction. In RCT II, we measured correct comprehension and time spent finding key results.
Results
RCT I: Participants with the SoF table (n=47) were more likely to “agree” or “strongly agree” that it was easy to find results for important outcomes than (n=25) participants without the SoF table—68% vs. 40% (P=0.021). RCT II: Participants with the SoF table (n=18) were more likely to correctly answer two questions regarding results than (n=15) those without the SoF table: 93% vs. 44% (P=0.003) and 87% vs. 11% (P<0.001). Participants with the SoF table spent an average of 90 seconds to find key information compared with 4 minutes for participants without the SoF table (P=0.002).
Conclusion
In two small trials, we found that inclusion of an SoF table in a review improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key findings compared with reviews with no SoF table.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20434024
1-page key messages
-
User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews
(Vitenskapelig artikkel 2010) -
Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries
(Vitenskapelig artikkel 2011) -
User experiences of evidence-based online resources for health professionals: user testing of The Cochrane Library
(Vitenskapelig artikkel 2008)
Formidling
