Andrew David Oxman

Oxman, Andy
Seniorforsker
Seksjon for global helse
Andrew.David.Oxman@kunnskapssenteret.no
Tlf. 482 54 924

Andrew David Oxman er forsker i Seksjon for global helse.

Prosjekter

Publikasjoner

ÅrTittelType
2015 Key concepts that people need to understand to assess claims about treatment effectsVitenskapelig artikkel
2015Effekt av tiltak for implementering av kliniske retningslinjerRapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
2015Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure people’s ability to assess claims about treatment effects (CLAIM)Foredrag/poster
2015Effect of interventions for implementing clinical practice guidelinesRapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
2014A reanalysis of cluster randomized trials showed interrupted time-series studies were valuable in health system evaluationVitenskapelig artikkel
2014Measuring peoples' understanding of the effects of treatments: a review of outcome measuresForedrag/poster
2013DECIDE Consortium. Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary resultsVitenskapelig artikkel
2013A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practiceVitenskapelig artikkel
2013Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. Vitenskapelig artikkel
2013Policymakers' and other stakeholders' perceptions of key considerations for health system decisions and the presentation of evidence to inform those considerations: an international surveyVitenskapelig artikkel
2013Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary resultsVitenskapelig artikkel
2013Development of a complex intervention to improve health literacy skillsVitenskapelig artikkel
2012Grade guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidenceVitenskapelig artikkel
2012Implementing evidence-based guidelines for managing depression in elderly patients: a Norwegian perspectiveVitenskapelig artikkel
2012GRADE guidelines 11-making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomesVitenskapelig artikkel
2012Internasjonale erfaringer med lovpålagte krav til rutinemessig evalueringRapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
2012Subgroup analyses: The devil is in the interpretationVitenskapelig artikkel
2012GRADE guidelines 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables-binary outcomesVitenskapelig artikkel
2011 GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectnessVitenskapelig artikkel
2011GRADE guidelines 5: rating the quality of evidence - publication biasVitenskapelig artikkel
2011GRADE guidelines 4: rating the quality of evidence – study limitations (risk of bias) and publication biasVitenskapelig artikkel
2011Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countriesVitenskapelig artikkel
2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistencyVitenskapelig artikkel
2011GRADE guidelines 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomesVitenskapelig artikkel
2011 GRADE guidelines 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesVitenskapelig artikkel
2011Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions.Cochrane-oversikt
2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidenceVitenskapelig artikkel
2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence - imprecisionVitenskapelig artikkel
2011Tailored implementation for chronic diseases Vitenskapelig artikkel
2011Framing of health information messageCochrane-oversikt
2011GRADE guidelines 3: rating the quality of evidence - introductionVitenskapelig artikkel
2011Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trialsCochrane-oversikt
2010Options for improving malaria treatment: IntroductionVitenskapelig artikkel
2010SUPPORT verktøy for kunnskapsbasert politikkutforming på helseområdet Rapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
2010Oppbygging av evidensbasert kunnskap for å styrke helsesystemer i lav- og middelinntektslandPopulærvitenskapelig artikkel
2010User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviewsVitenskapelig artikkel
2010Policy development in malaria vector management in Mozambique, South Africa and ZimbabweVitenskapelig artikkel
2010Brukermedvirkning på systemnivå i helsetjenestene, kliniske retningslinjer og pasientinformasjonCochrane-oversikt
2010A pragmatic randomised trial of stretching before and after physical activity to prevent injury and sorenessVitenskapelig artikkel
2010Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key informationVitenskapelig artikkel
2010The effect of how outcomes are framed on decisions about whether to take antihypertensive medication: a randomized trialVitenskapelig artikkel
2010A framework for mandatory impact evaluation to ensure well informed public policy decisionsVitenskapelig artikkel
2010Helseøkonomisk analyse av bevacizumab+paclitaxel sammenlignet med paclitaxel alene som førstelinjebehandling ved metastatisk brystkreftCochrane-oversikt
2009A pragmatic randomised trial of stretching before and after physical activity to prevent injury and soreness Vitenskapelig artikkel
2009A pragmatic resolutionVitenskapelig artikkel
2009A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designersVitenskapelig artikkel
2009Why we will remain pragmatists: four problems with the impractical mechanistic framework and a better solutionVitenskapelig artikkel
2009En pragmatisk randomisert studie av tøyning før og etter fysisk aktivitet for å forebygge skader og stølhetVitenskapelig artikkel
2009Improving how your organisation supports the use of evidence to inform policymaking.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial resultsCochrane-oversikt
2009The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsVitenskapelig artikkel
2009Effekt av etterutdanning av helsepersonell Cochrane-oversikt
2009Can paying for results help to achieve the Millennium Development Goals? Overview of the effectiveness of results-based financingVitenskapelig artikkel
2009Effekt av etterutdanning av helsepersonellCochrane-oversikt
2009Fra forskning til politikkutforming: behandling av svangerskapsforgiftning og malariabekjempelse i tre land i det sørlige Afrika Vitenskapelig artikkel
2009Fair tests of health-care policies and treatments: a request for help from readersVitenskapelig artikkel
2009The Effect of Alternative Summary Statistics for Communicating Risk Reduction on Decisions about Taking Statins: A Randomized TrialVitenskapelig artikkel
2009The effect of alternative graphical displays used to present the benefits of antibiotics for sore throat on decisions about whether to seek treatment: a randomized trialVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational drug useVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Samhandling om helsetjenestene til pasienter med kroniske tilstander Notat
2008Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Outcomes of patients who participate in randomised controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2008An overview of research on the effects of results-based financingRapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
2008How should the impact of different presentations of treatment effects on patient choice be evaluated? Vitenskapelig artikkel
2008What is ‘quality of evidence’ and why is it important to clinicians?Vitenskapelig artikkel
2008Incorporating considerations of resource useVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Evidence-informed health policy 3 - Interviews with the directors of organizations that support the use of research evidenceVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Evidence-informed health policy 4 - Case descriptions of organizations that support the use of research evidence Vitenskapelig artikkel
2008GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendatinsVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Kunnskapssenterets bidrag på Cochrane Colloquium i Freiburg 2008Foredrag/poster
2008Evidence-informed health policy 1 – Synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidenceVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Evidence-Informed Health Policy: Using Research to Make Health Systems HealthierRapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
2008Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategiesVitenskapelig artikkel
2008GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Evidence-informed health policy 2 – Survey of organizations that support the use of research evidenceVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Going from evidence to recommendationsVitenskapelig artikkel
2008Supporting the delivery of cost-effective interventions in primary health-care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviewsVitenskapelig artikkel
2008What should clinicians do when faced with conflicting recommendations? Vitenskapelig artikkel
2007Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribersVitenskapelig artikkel
2007Assessing equity in clinical practice guidelines.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2007WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines for pharmacological management of sporadic human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1)Vitenskapelig artikkel
2007Improving the use of research evidence in guideline developmentRapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
2007Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2007A Televised, Web-Based Randomised Trial of an Herbal Remedy (Valerian) for InsomniaVitenskapelig artikkel
2007A Televised, Web-Based Randomised Trial of an Herbal Remedy (Valerian) for Insomnia. Vitenskapelig artikkel
2007Educational outreach to general practitioners reduces children's asthma symptoms: a cluster randomised controlled trial.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2007NorthStar, a support tool for the design and evaluation of quality improvement interventions in healthcare.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2007The effects of mandatory prescribing of thiazides for newly treated, uncomplicated hypertension: interrupted time-series analysis.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2007Use of evidence in WHO recommendationsVitenskapelig artikkel
2007Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: a randomized trial.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2007Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesVitenskapelig artikkel
2006The plain language summary: Cochrane’s most valuable product?Foredrag/poster
2006Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback Vitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvementVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidenceVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendationsVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processesVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 16. EvaluationVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelinesVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 12. Incorporating considerations of equityVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 15. Disseminating and implementing guidelinesVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptationVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 14. Reporting guidelinesVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation processVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to includeVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Evaluering av nytt refusjonsvilkår for blodtrykksbehandling (tiazidregelen) Notat
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 6. Determining which outcomes are importantVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introductionVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Rational Prescribing in Primary Care (RaPP): A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Tailored InterventionVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informative Vitenskapelig artikkel
2006An International Dialogue on Evidence-informed Action to Achieve Health Goals in Developing CountriesBakgrunnsnotat (WHO)
2006Referanseprising kan gi mer rasjonell bruk av legemidlerVitenskapelig artikkel
2006Overview of systematic methodology reviews of the design and conduct of randomized trials and systematic reviews of healthcare interventionsRapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
2005Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2005Retningslinjer for allmennpraksis - blir de lest og blir de brukt?Vitenskapelig artikkel
2005Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingVitenskapelig artikkel
2005Hva gjør fastleger for å holde seg faglig oppdatert?Vitenskapelig artikkel
2005Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome Vitenskapelig artikkel
2005The OFF theory of research utilization.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2005Translating research into policy and practice in developing countries: a case study of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsiaVitenskapelig artikkel
2005Portals to Wonderland: Health Portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health careVitenskapelig artikkel
2005It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data: a response to Eccle's criticism of the OFF theory of research utilization. Vitenskapelig artikkel
2005System og markedssviktVitenskapelig artikkel
2005International variation in prescribing antihypertensive drugs: Its extent and possible explanationsVitenskapelig artikkel
2005Utredning av offentlige, publikumsrettede informasjonstiltak på nett innenfor helseRapport fra Kunnskapssenteret
2004Improving prescribing of antihypertensive and cholesterol-lowering drugs: a method for identifying and addressing barriers to change.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2004Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2004Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Vitenskapelig artikkel
2003How should information about the effects of healthcare be presented? Vitenskapelig artikkel
2003Medical messages in the media--barriers and solutions to improving medical journalism.Vitenskapelig artikkel
2002Blind faith? The effects of promoting active sick leave for back pain patients: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Vitenskapelig artikkel
(http://www.kunnskapssenteret.no/om-oss/ansatte/oxman)